[originally posted 15 August 2015] A few days ago, in Part 34 , I considered the possibility that public bodies might, in their handling of FOI requests, commit a criminal offence by deliberately not releasing all the relevant information to which the applicant is entitled. I have come across an example so apparently blatant a breach of the law that I am incredulous that no offence was committed. How can this be? Let me backtrack to my last post, In Part 33 I wrote about Paul Delamore’s victory in having the Scottish Information Commissioner decide that Police Scotland should release the information he had requested. My analysis was incomplete. I had ignored a key part of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 – FOISA. I hadn’t even read the relevant section. I must also say that I didn’t recognise my omission: a friend had to point this out to me. The crucial part is Section 65 Basically this says that if an applicant is not given all the informat...
CALUM IN THE WORDS OF OTHERS
"major contributor to any understanding of what took place in April 1985" Ron Culley
"forensic pursuit of the truth of the death of Willie McRae shames the police and procurator fiscal service" Ron Culley
"as slimy a toad as the rest of the ecofreaks" Dr Gary K Busch
"not my kind of journalism" Karel Knipp