Skip to main content

Part 9: Time Questions for Police


In Parts 7 and 8 I used the information released by the police in 2005 to create a timeline for the McRae crash but only 5 event times were specific to time and day.  Therefore, I estimated the earliest (and, where relevant, the latest) times at which events could have happened.

My estimates are simply that.

Only the police can be definite and I call on them to answer the questions below.



There will be more questions to come when I have completed my analysis of the police documents.

I need to point out that having answers to all these questions will not, on their own, take us any closer to unravelling the mystery but we will have an accurate timeframe against which to measure other evidence.  Almost as important will be the feeling that the police are now being open.

But if the police continue to hide behind the ridiculous reasoning used to prevent their answering Delamore’s questions,
that it is never in the public interest to disclose information that gives criminals an advantage over the police and prejudices the police forces' ability to prevent and detect crime, apprehend or prosecute offenders. Nor is it in the public interest to put members of the public or police staff at risk. [Source]

and
[Police Scotland (name removed)] noted that whilst there is public interest in providing accountability in relation to the efficiency and effectiveness of the police force and its officers in any investigation, that does not outweigh the harm in disclosing information collated for an investigation which could provide those minded to criminality with an advantage which may hinder the prevention or detection of crime. 

then they will continue to give succour to those who believe they have something to hide.
-------------------------------------------

For completeness here is Delamore’s response to the first of his rejections but yet Police Scotland still managed to respond negatively and withhold information,
Evidently, I am of the belief that due to the investigation being 29 years old and with there being, in the words of former Lord Advocate Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, "no circumstances to warrant criminal proceedings" (July 1, 1985) then I fail to see how an exception can be maintained.

You have concluded, whilst considering the public interest, "that it is never in the public interest to disclose information that gives criminals an advantage over the police and prejudices the police forces' ability to prevent and detect crime, apprehend or prosecute offenders. Nor is it in the public interest to put members of the public or police staff at risk."

Indeed, I do not understand what advantage would be gained by criminals from a 29-year-old police investigation from a police body which no longer exists and operated differently to what Police Scotland does today. Nor is there any worry of apprehending or prosecuting offenders in this case - as there were "no circumstances to warrant criminal proceedings" and the former Lord Advocate Colin Boyd, in 2006, responding to a question from Christine Grahame MSP in Parliament, said:

"The circumstances surrounding the death of William MacRae have been fully considered on a number of occasions and there is no basis upon which to instruct any type of public inquiry." (14 August 2006 - Question S2W-27467)

Therefore, I do not accept that the information that I have asked for fits into your exception. They are mere minor details relating to the investigation with absolutely no bearing on any criminality - comparable with details already released in documentation in Andy Muirhead's FOI request (Northern Constabulary FOI Ref: 176-13) - nor do they pose any threat to witnesses nor would it give criminals any advantages.

You are suggesting that the time at which photographs were taken, the time at which the car was removed and that the time of the post-mortem are considered factors that any present or future criminals would take advantage of which, quite frankly, is nonsensical. There is no risk to any witnesses as the details do not relate to any witnesses.  


[originally posted 7 January 2015]

__________________________________________________________________

If you have thoughts, or more, feel free to:
email me at calumsblogATgmailDOTcom or
tweet me at @calumcarr


© CalumCarr 2014
__________________________________________________________________
COPYRIGHT
Copyright over this article is retained by me, CalumCarr
Please feel free to reproduce extracts and images provided you attribute the words and images to me
If you wish to use more than one quarter of the article then contact me for permission at calumsblogATgmailDOTcom.




Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Part 1: Introduction

Willie McRae: born 18 May 1923; died 7 April 1985 This we know for certain but much else in his life and death is open to conjecture. What is fact or fiction? Truth or lies? Openness or obfuscation? Will we ever know? Probably not but in this series – may be 1 post or 20 posts depending on my enthusiasm – I want to look back and review his story.  The best way to ensure I keep going with my review is to write and post as I go on.   You, my readers, are key to my continuing! I must have read about Willie in the 80s but I only became aware of him on Sunday past when the Sunday Express published a story more than 24 years after his death. [ Original source ; archived source ] Of course, we note the very important, … it was claimed last night. There’s nothing definite here but you can start to see that McRae’s life might not be straightforward. Within the rest of the article there is more. So here we have claims that he was killed: - by drug smugglers - by security services...
Read more

Archive Notes

Between December 2014 and August 2015 I investigated the death in 1985 of lawyer and SNP politician, Willie McRae.   All my work was published on my blog  "calumcarr on .... whatever" which is now closed. This work is now republished here. My writing did not cover the entire case but it is a very detailed study over 36 posts. I have checked to ensure links are still live and have corrected obvious spelling mistakes. Almost certainly, I will have missed some mistakes and created new mistakes for which I apologise. Other than these very minor changes, the posts are republished here as they were originally posted. The work is presented here in chronological order.   Unfortunately, to achieve this, the original publishing dates have been removed and all comments lost. In preparing the posts for the archive I have come across the occasional error of logic, where a conclusion may be incorrect. I have left these untouched so the posts read as did the original...
Read more

Part 2: Last Journey

This is another scene-setting post.   To launch into all the confusions and contradictions now would lead to our getting totally lost in a mishmash of facts, lies and conjecture.  Better that I outline the basics first and then go back and look in more detail.  I hope Part 4 will start this more detailed process but I’m not sure of my path yet.  Time spent well now will bear fruit.  Also because of the complexity of this case each detailed post is likely to take me several days to write.  Please bear with me. -------------- On Friday, 5th April 1985 about 6.30pm, Willie McRae set out from Glasgow to his holiday home near Dornie in Wester Ross – about a 170 mile drive.  Almost the entire drive was on single carriageway roads with much of the driving being in the dark.  Sunset would have been about 8.05pm [based on sunset being that time on 6th April 2015].  Google maps estimates the driving time as 3h 55min.  He should have arrived s...
Read more